Saturday, June 21, 2014

Yersinia Infections in Transfusions


Yersinia enterocolitica is a human pathogen that affects the G.I. system. It causes fever, diarrhea, and abdominal pains, and can sometimes be mistaken for appendicitis and is usually spread by contact with fecal material. However, it is a very important infection in blood banking, as it is the leading cause of post-transfusion septic infections.

Y. enterocolitica is a common contaminant is stored blood. The bacteria has several adaptions that allow it to thrive under the conditions blood is stored. Yersinia species are siderophilic, meaning they like high-iron environments, as is in stored blood. Y. enterocolitica can survive and even reproduce in temperatures down to -2C, allowing them to grow at the refrigerated temperatures blood is stored. The bacteria use glucose and adenine, found in storage additives, for metabolism and growth, and have an optimal pH of 7.0 – 8.0, and blood is stored around 7.3. It has been shown calcium prevents growth of pathogenic Yersinia but only above 30C, so blood stored with a calcium chelated anticoagulant does not prevent infection.

Y. enterocolitica can cause an asymptomatic infection in the intestines that disseminates to the blood, which is how is eventually contaminates stored blood. Donors who are asymptomatic or who have bacterial counts low enough to not present symptoms are not routinely screened. The bacteria do not actively cause sepsis, but trigger a major generalized inflammatory response, thought to be the result of a cell wall component that strongly binds to and activates macrophages, who initiate a cytokine cascade throughout the body.

Serologic donor testing is expensive and infections caused by Y. enterocolitica is relatively rare. The simplest ways to prevent post-transfusion infections from the bacteria are not allowing donors the give blood if they do not feel well or have any signs of infection, not giving blood older than 3 weeks to susceptible recipients because the  bacteria take 3 to 4 weeks to reach dangerous levels in refrigerated blood, and using pre-storage leukocyte-reducing techniques because the bacteria have a strong affinity for WBCs.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21865196

Saturday, June 14, 2014

Sous-vide Cooking and Bacteria

I have a confession: I love to cook. It's a combination of art and science, and you can eat the final product! My favorite aspect of cooking is food science and learning the processes that take raw ingredients and turn them into food, and I read a lot about modern and next gen cooking techniques. That's how I learned about and started using sous-vide.


Sous-vide is a cooking method like baking, broiling, or grilling. Food is placed into a vaccum-sealed bag and usually submersed in a water bath. The water is kept at a precise temperature using some type of heater/thermostat combination and the food is cooked by heat diffusion through the bag. The food cooked this way is not soggy, the flavors are sealed with the food, and extremely specific temperatures can be used. Most sous-vide is done with meat. Steaks can be cooked to a perfect medium-rare just by setting the temperature to the correct degree. And because the water, and therefore the food, never exceeds that temperature and no moisture is lost, food can be left in it for days without overcooking. The problem is most sous-vide cooking takes place between 120F to 150F; in the bacterial danger zone.

The theory behind preparing food safely is bacteria don't have a thermometer that kills them only if a certain temperature is reached. There are charts, graphs, and computer models that predict the death rate of certain food-borne pathogens, and the rate is a curve. Cooking chicken to 165F kills salmonella in a few seconds, but it take several minutes to completely kill at 150F. So theoretically, as long as you let food sit in the water bath long enough, it will pasteurize it and be as safe as conventional cooking, while being juicer and more tender.

However, most models for recommended cooking times do extend into the low temperatures that sous-vide uses. Many publications exist, but few actually link scientific or regulatory reports for the cooking times. Here is a page from a popular sous-vide immersion circulator company that lists times and temperatures, but the only source is a link to the FDA homepage. Most cooking times are based on the old models for high temperature, so the temperatures are not approved by food agencies. But the Institute of Food Research in the UK and the USDA/FDA have both begun programs to update the current models to include low temperature cooking.

I personally don't have a problem with sous-vide and have made several meals at home without any problems using the times provided from other chefs, as have many other people. I will continue to use sous-vide as an alternative cooking method and use safe food-handling practices when cooking to keep the risk for contamination low.

Douglas Baldwin: A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking

Institute of Food Research Bacterial Growth Model Study pdf


Friday, June 6, 2014

Glowing Burn Dressings Detect Infections

Burns are some of the most difficult wounds to treat. Large open sores are easy for bacteria to colonize, and most serious burns require hospitalization, which can lead to exposure to infectious pathogens. The pathophysiologic response to a burn, as well as its involvement with skin that is colonized by opportunistic pathogens, are the major reasons for infections. A burn compromises the innate protection of the skin, decreases T-cell activity by decreasing the number of helper cells, decreases the levels of inflammatory cytokines and complements, and decreases the bactericidal activity of neutrophils. Common bacteria that infect burn wounds include Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosaKlebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter  baumannii.  

Currently, if an infection is suspected, the wound dressing is removed so a swab or scraping can be obtained. This exposes the wound, increases healing time and the likeliness a scar will develop. Testing of the sample can take several days to culture and identify the bacteria. The University of Bath's biochemistry department has developed a wound dressing patch that fluoresces in the presence of infectious bacteria. Most bacteria causing infections release toxins. These toxins break down nanocapsules which are filled with a fluorescent compound and bacteriophages. The fluorescent chemical glows under UV light, alerting doctors to an infection without removing the dressing, and can even detect toxins at concentrations below that which the body starts reacting, allowing doctors to start treatment before the bacteria cause an actual infection. The bacteriophages are viruses that attack and kill bacteria. They can help prevent and stop infections, even by those caused by microbes like MSRA that are resistant to antibiotics. The patches work well in the laboratory, but it will be some time before human trials begin.


University of Bath Research

Burn Wound Pathophysiology

Friday, May 30, 2014

What's Swimming in the Pool With You?

Over the last couple of weeks pools have been opening for the summer. I have a few friends with pools and live close to a large public pool. I know a lot of work goes into keeping the water as clean and clear as possible. Chlorine is a common additive to kill microbes and it does a pretty good job, but are there some out there that can survive? What kinds of bacteria are in public pools? How do I avoid getting an infection from something in the water? The CDC has the answers.


Swimmers

The CDC conducted a study of swimming pools in 2012. They sampled water filters in public pools to see what was potentially in the water. They found Escherichia coli in 58% of filters they tested. This indicates a lot of fecal matter enters the water. E. coli is common in the human gut and in feces, so it's presence in water is a marker for fecal contamination. People contaminate pools with feces when they have an "accident" in the pool or it washes off the body from people who haven't showered before entering the pool. On the bright side, no samples tested positive for O157:H7, a particularly virulent strain that produces a deadly toxin.

The CDC also found Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 59% of samples. P. aeruginosa is a bacteria that causes skin rashes and ear infections, and is the bacteria behind "Swimmer's ear". It is a natural contaminant, usually from inadequate chlorine and pH levels, and is also introduced from people. Cryptosporidium and Giardia were found in less than 2% of samples. Cryptosporidium is a bacteria that causes a bowel disease similar to dysentery. Giardia is a parasitic protozoan that causes diarrhea, vomiting, cramps, and dehydration. The study did not test water parks or residential pools, but believe the hygiene, sanitation, and contamination between pools is similar due to the most common microbes coming from swimmers themselves.

Prevention

The CDC recommends swimmers: 
Keep feces and other contaminants out of the water.
  -Do not swim when you have diarrhea.
  -Shower with soap before you start swimming.
  -Take a rinse shower before you get back into the water.
  -Take bathroom breaks every 60 minutes.
  -Wash your hands with soap after using the toilet or changing diapers.
Check the chlorine level and pH before getting into the water. 
Do not swallow the water you swim in.

Happy swimming this summer!

CDC Study 
CDC Healthy Swimming 

Friday, May 23, 2014

Fungal Infections

The last couple of weeks we have learned of a few infectious fungi like Cryptococcus sp. and Candida sp. We study bacteria and bacteria-related infections in depth, but very time is spent on fungal infections. A lot of people, including me, think it weird that something like yeast can cause a serious infection. The stuff you make bread with can make you sick? No way.

We talk about yeast and species of fungi, but I still associate it with the powder I mix into dough to get it to rise and the stuff in beer and wine that makes alcohol. I wanted to find out more about diseases caused from fungi, and what I did find was interesting. I didn't know there were so many species that had nothing to do with the carbon dioxide-producing baking aides. Here are some of the highlights.

Fungal Infections and HIV/AIDS

Fungal infections aren't something that happens often, and that's because our body does a great job of stopping infections and killing invaders. Fungi generally aren't protected by much and take a much longer time to grow and establish themselves than a bacterial infection would. But in a patient who was a weak or non-functioning immune system, opportunistic infectious agents have an easy time colonizing the body. That's why most fungal infections are seen in immunocompromized patients and why they are so serious. According to the paper linked below, around 50% of AIDS-related deaths are caused by fungal infections. Here are some of the most common fungal infections in HIV/AIDS patients.

Cryptococcosis



Cryptococcosis is caused by Cryptococcus neoformans. The fungus is inhaled and enters the lungs. The lack of protection from alveolar macrophages allows the fungus to spread to the blood, and later to the brain and CSF. Encephalomeningitis causes increased cranial pressure that leads to death. Sub-Sahara Africa sees the majority of infections, but the infection can occur in all populated areas. This is considered one of the more dangerous fungal infections because without help from the bodies' immune system it is difficult to clear and once symptoms appear the disease progresses rapidly. However, once the fungus is detected, the mortality rate for developed countries is about 9% but 70% in developing countries. Drugs like Amphotericin B and flucytosine are used in treatment. The defining identification of cryptococcal meningitis is a positive India ink stain of CSF fluid, but the fungus can be found in other tissues, especially the lung and brain.

To Be Continued

A neglected epidemic: fungal infections in HIV/AIDS.


Thursday, May 15, 2014

Colleges Using Unapproved Meningitis Vaccines

Princeton University and the University of California Santa Barbara recently experienced outbreaks of meningitis B. Meningitis B is a serologic group of bacterial meningitis. Meningitis in general is highly contagious in close quarters, such as college classrooms and dorms. There are FDA approved vaccines for other serologic groups, but no vaccine for type B.

There are 8 reported cases at Princeton and 4 at UCSB. The first case at Princeton was found in March 2013 and the first case at UCSB was found in November 2013. With no vaccines, Princeton was worried about the infection spreading. They were allowed to use an unapproved vaccine by the FDA under an "Investigational New Drug" tag to use the vaccine Bexsero, which is the only vaccine to protect against type B. The vaccine is approved in Europe, Australia, and Canada. About 5,000 students were vaccinated. Later that year, type B meningitis infections were found at UCSB. The same vaccine was allowed to prevent further outbreaks. A booster shot was offered at Princeton in February.

The CDC reports the FDA claims the vaccines are safe for use in specific situations, such as outbreaks in susceptible populations. There are no major side effects except a severe allergic reaction, which is extremely rare. The FDA uses the IND tag to approve use of a drug they feel is safe and the benefits are greater than the risks, and they applied it to Bexsero because they have not yet approved it for use for the general public in the US. The vaccine is a two-part intramuscular shot that requires a second booster 6 months after the initial vaccination to maximize protection.

Huffington Post

The Princeton Sun

CDC Type B Vaccine and Outbreaks

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Welcome

My name is Zack and I'm a Clinical Laboratory Sciences (CLS) graduate student. I'll be posting interesting things from Infectious Diseases and Microbiology classes or outside sources I find that relate to the courses. So for an intro, I'll answer a few common questions.

What is a Clinical Laboratory Scientist?

Well, to start off I think it's best to say what we are not. We are not nurses or doctors. We work very closely with them, but we are definitely a separate field.  CLS and Medical Technologists are specialists in the clinical lab. We handle samples like blood, tissue, and other body fluids and analyze them to find out more about patient health and disease states. We are most commonly found in hospital labs, but also work in reference labs, private offices, and government facilities.

What's the difference of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases?

Microbiology is the study of microscopic organisms such as bacteria, yeasts, and parasites. Microbiology is all about the classification and characterization of the organism. We learn how to classify and identify bacteria based on growth patterns, staining, biochemical tests, antimicrobial susceptibility, and even physical senses like color and smell. Micro focuses on the just the organism.

Infectious Diseases looks at the associated diseases caused by the organisms.  It is about classifying organisms based on common disease traits to help pinpoint the organism or group of organisms most likely responsible so the best treatment and therapy can be given to a patient.

I hope this gives you some idea what this blog will be about!